No walking away from responsibility
Times have changed.
In the news recently was an interesting case regarding a divorced couple in Hawaii.
They have a child.
One of the divorcees wants to formally sever parental rights.
What is unusual — and should not be allowed to get in the way of doing what is best for the child — is that the divorcees are two women.
They were married in Washington, D.C., in 2013, then moved to Hawaii. According to court documents, the two had discussed having a child together.
In 2015, one partner became pregnant through a sperm donor. The other woman promptly filed for and received a divorce.
Then, she sought to sever parental rights and, presumably, responsibility for the child. A family court refused to approve; the case is being heard by the Hawaii Supreme Court.
Of course, many issues play into the dispute.
“This is a very important and of-the-moment question in the LGBT community right now, which is how are states going to treat parents of children where there (is) a same-sex marriage couple,” commented Cathy Sakimura of the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Hawaii’s top court will have to sort out the facts.
But the bottom line is that a child has been brought into the world as a result of a marriage.
Allowing one former partner to walk away from that responsibility is wrong — regardless of whether the parents were a same-sex couple.