Trending
Tim Mannello
Williamsport
How can a nation meaningfully celebrate 250 years of independence if it forgets the one force that made that independence possible: a largely shared, objective view of reality. Yet today, we live in a moment when false claims spread faster than facts, and repetition outweighs proof. The danger isn't just misinformation, but what fills the void when truth can no longer hold a nation together. Our choice is brutal and simple: we either live according to a shared view of reality, or we be ruled by imposed, manufactured "alternative facts."
George Orwell once wrote, "The first obligation of thoughtful people is to restate the obvious." And the obvious is this: only ideas that withstand evidence--not guesses, vibes, wishful thinking or conspiracy theories--deserve to be believed. Strip away the noise, hype and half truths, and one fact remains: a claim that cannot be proven is unworthy of trust. Too many assertions circulating today fail that basic test.
One such assertion claims that President Biden's 2020 election victory was secured through widespread fraud. Numerous courts, state election officials from both major parties and independent audits found no fraud capable of altering the outcome. Yet the claim keeps circulating, showing how an idea can survive even when it collapses under scrutiny.
A related assertion is that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was not an effort to overturn the certified 2020 results. Investigations, court records and statements from participants documented that disrupting certification was the central motive. The persistence of the contrary claim shows how discarding evidence reshapes the narrative.
Economic claims follow the same pattern. One example is the assertion that U.S. tariffs are borne by foreign exporters, not American importers and consumers. Economists across ideological lines have shown through price analyses and trade data that tariff costs are largely passed on domestically. The idea persists despite evidence.
Similarly, the U. S. war with Iran is not unethical, does not violate international law or the Constitution and U. S. law. The initiation of this war violated several conditions in traditional just war theory. The war began without Congressional or U. N. authorization. Consequently, this war is considered unconstitutional domestically and illegal internationally.
Another baseless assertion is that killing survivors of maritime attacks is not explicitly prohibited under U.S. or international law. Historically, war crime tribunals and codified law have established protections for survivors. The claim contradicts decades of precedent.
Some territorial claims are also unfounded. The idea that the United States holds a legal right to forcibly acquire countries like Cuba or Greenland has no grounding in international law, which affirms the autonomy of nations and prohibits acquiring territory by force.
Another unsupported claim is that Ukraine started the Russia Ukraine war. Reporting from international organizations and security analysts shows that Russia launched an invasion against Ukraine in February 2022. This attempt to shift blame shows how misinformation can distort well documented events.
Claiming NATO helps Europe more than America ignores reality. The United States gains enormous strategic, economic and security advantages from the alliance. Calling this partnership an "unfair deal"" is a blatant distortion.
Scientific misinformation also thrives. The claim that human caused greenhouse gases aren't warming Earth contradicts conclusions of scientific bodies worldwide. The evidence--from temperature records to atmospheric measurements--is overwhelming.
The claim that "no man is above the law" is deceitful when a president undermines the rule of law by accepting foreign gifts, enriching himself and his circle at the taxpayers' expense, concealing the identity of pedophile traffickers and pursuing baseless indictments against rivals without consequence.
Most late 18th century colonists agreed with the political facts like the Boston Massacre and the Coercive Acts as shared reference points. Some interpreted these facts differently and chose different sides. But when a country can't agree on reality, it falls apart--people split into hostile camps and government stalls because people argue over the inarguable.
Only a ruler who imposes a single reality can hold a nation together after its people stop sharing one. As we celebrate our 250th birthday, here's the hard truth: when fact-based mainstream reporters are targeted as "enemies of the people," the dictator's propaganda becomes the last authority standing.